Volume 10 • Supplement 1 • 2005 H E L I C O B A C T E R Helicobacter pylori and Non-malignant Diseases
Limas Kupcinskas* and Peter Malfertheiner†
*Department of Gastroenterology, Kaunas University of Medicine, Kaunas, Lithuania; †Otto-von-Guericke-Universität, Magdeburg, Zentrum für Innere Medizin, Klinik für Gastroenterologie, Hepatologie und Infectiologie, Magdeburg, Germany
A B S T R A C T
This paper reviews new literature data from March
in case of low prevalence of the infection. H. pylori
2004 to April 2005 about the association between
eradication is of value in chronic NSAID users, but is
Helicobacter pylori and non-malignant disease of the
insufficient to prevent NSAID-related ulcer disease.
upper gastrointestinal tract. Eradication of H. pylori
In developed countries H. pylori eradication does
is indicated for all patients with non-malignant diseases
not cause gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GORD),
associated with this pathogen. However, its effect is
however, a negative association between H. pylori and
variable, ranging from the highest benefit in the cure
GORD does exist, especially in Asia, but the nature
of peptic ulcer disease to a small benefit in patients
of this relationship should be further clarified.
with non-ulcer dyspepsia. Test and treat strategy is
Keywords. Helicobacter pylori, peptic ulcer disease,
still cost-effective for management of patients with
gastro-esophageal reflux disease, nonsteroidal anti-
uninvestigated dyspepsia. The only limitations of the
inflammatory drugs, non-ulcer dyspepsia, uninvest-
strategy are the patient’s age and the cost benefit ratio
independent of the cag pathogenicity island (PAI). Peptic Ulcer Disease
The outcome of a H. pylori infection is thought to
The role of Helicobacter pylori in peptic ulcer reflect an interplay between the virulence of the
disease (PUD) has been well established.
infecting strain, host genetics, and environmental
However, in the past year, newer data on this
factors. Lu et al. tested whether host genotypes
issue were provided. Researchers from Graham’s
of the tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha)
group identified a H. pylori gene that encompasses
promotor single nucleotide polymorphism could
both jhp0917 and jhp0918 called dupA (duodenal
determine clinical and histological outcomes in
ulcer-promoting gene) and is associated with duo-
case of H. pylori infection [3]. They revealed that
denal ulcer (DU) [1]. dupA was present in 42%
both TNF-alpha-1031C and -863A carriers have
of DU vs. 21% of patients with gastritis (adjusted
increased DU and gastric ulcer (GU) risk in the
odds ratio [OR] = 3.1, 95% confidence interval
presence of H. pylori infection. As compared to
[CI] = 1.7–5.7). dupA is a novel marker associated
TNF-α-863CC and -1031TT genotype combina-
with an increased risk for DU and reduced risk
tions, the ulcer risk in case of H. pylori infection
for gastric atrophy and cancer. Its association with
was 2.46 (95% CI = 1.32–4.59) for the carriers
DU-promoting and -protective effects against
with either the -1031C or -863A allele, with an
atrophy/cancer was evident in both Asian and
increase of up to 6.06 (95% CI = 3.57–10.21) for
Western countries. Researchers from the Nether-
the individuals harboring both -863A and -1031C
lands revealed that H. pylori plasticity region locus
alleles. For patients with GU, the 863CC genotype
jhp0947–jhp0949 is associated with DU and
had a higher rate of intestinal metaplasia than the
interleukin-12 production in monocyte cells [2].
-863A carrier. The authors concluded that TNF-
The jhp0947–jhp0949 loci might be a novel
alpha-1031 and -863 promoter single nucleotide
putative H. pylori marker for disease outcome
polymorphism should be novel host factors todetermine the risk of peptic ulceration upon
Reprint requests to: Limas Kupcinskas, Department of
Gastroenterology, Kaunas University of Medicine,
Mickeviciaus Str. 9, Kaunas, LT-44307, Lithuania. E-mail: [email protected]
within the past century. A large epidemiological
2005 Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Helicobacter, 10 (Suppl. 1), 26–33
H. pylori and Non-malignant Diseases
study was carried out in Copenhagen County,
for 2–4 more weeks (OR = 1.11; 95% CI = 0.71–
Denmark [4]. A random sample of 2416 Danish
adults with no history of PUD were enrolled in
Maintenance of antisecretory therapy has been
a population-based prospective cohort study in
the standard long-term treatment for patients with
1983 and 1994. The overall 11-year cumulative
bleeding ulcers to prevent recurrent bleeding
incidence of PUD was 2.9% (95% CI = 2.2–3.6),
even after the discovery of H. pylori. However,
i.e. 1.6% (95% CI = 1.1–2.1) for DU, and 1.3%
the precise efficacy of H. pylori eradication for
(95% CI = 0.8–1.7) for GU. Poor socioeconomic
the prevention of rebleeding from peptic ulcer
status increased the risk of PUD independently
was unknown and the authors of a Cochrane
of H. pylori infection (OR = 2.7; 95% CI = 1.1–
Collaboration systematic review have shown
6.1) and accounted for 17% of all ulcer cases.
that treatment of H. pylori infection is more
High physical activity at work increased the risk
effective than antisecretory therapy alone, with
of PUD in people infected with H. pylori (OR =
or without long-term maintenance antisecretory
2.6; 95% CI = 0.8–8.0). Family history of PUD
therapy, in preventing recurrent bleeding from
or Lewis blood group antigens did not relate to
PU. Consequently, all patients with PU bleeding
ulcer incidence. In developing countries, a
should be tested for H. pylori infection, and
decline of the prevalence of PUD might be the
eradication therapy should be prescribed to
consequence of the global decreasing prevalence
H. pylori-positive patients [7].
The most effective therapy for H. pylori-
H. pylori and NSAIDs
associated ulcer disease is bacterial eradication. More than 15 years of experience were summar-
Despite very intense research during recent years,
ized in a comprehensive Cochrane Collaboration
the relation and interaction of nonsteroidal anti-
systematic review, updated in 2004 [5]. Data from
inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and aspirin with
53 trials were included to compare eradication
H. pylori infection in causing upper gastrointestinal
therapy to placebo or pharmacological therapies
damage remain a very controversial and complex
in H. pylori-positive patients. In DU healing,
eradication therapy was superior to an ulcer-
Greek researchers compared acute upper gas-
healing drug (relative risk [RR] of ulcer persisting =
trointestinal bleeders taking NSAIDs and non-
0.66; 95% CI = 0.58–0.76) and to no treatment
bleeding NSAID users and found that H. pylori
(RR = 0.37; 95% CI = 0.26–0.53). In GU healing,
infection was the only significant risk factor for
no significant differences were detected between
upper gastrointestinal bleeding (OR = 1.7; 95%
eradication therapy and ulcer healing drugs
CI = 1.2–2.5). CagA positivity was not associated
(RR = 1.32; 95% CI = 0.92–1.90). In preventing
with gastrointestinal bleeding [8]. Another case-
DU recurrence, no significant differences were
control study was prospectively conducted in 105
detected between eradication therapy and main-
H. pylori-negative DU bleeders and the same
tenance therapy with ulcer-healing drugs (RR of
number of sex- and age-matched H. pylori-positive
recurring ulcer = 0.73; 95% CI = 0.42–1.25), but
patients. They found that NSAID consumption was
eradication therapy was superior to no treatment
more common among H. pylori-negative patients
(RR = 0.20; 95% CI = 0.15–0.26). In preventing
(81%) compared to H. pylori-positive subjects
gastric ulcer recurrence, eradication therapy
(58.1%, p < .001). H. pylori-negative bleeders
was superior to no treatment (RR = 0.28; 95%
needed hemostasis more often (55.2% vs. 31.4%,
CI = 0.18–0.43). Gisbert and Pajares performed
p < .001) or surgical intervention (15.2% vs. 4.8%,
a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials
p = .011) and included a greater proportion of
comparing the efficacy on ulcer healing of a 7-
rebleeding (32.4% vs. 13.3%, p = .001) and a higher
day proton pump inhibitor (PPI)-based triple
rate of in-hospital mortality (15.2% vs. 3.8%,
therapy vs. the same regimen but prolonging the
p = .005) [9]. The effect of H. pylori eradication
PPI for several more weeks. Authors concluded
on gastroduodenal mucosal injury induced by
that in patients with PUD and H. pylori infec-
taking medium-dose aspirin (300 mg) was invest-
tion, prolonging the therapy with PPI after a
igated in another study. All subjects underwent
triple therapy for 7 days with a PPI and two anti-
upper gastrointestinal endoscopy for determina-
biotics is not necessary to induce ulcer healing.
tion of H. pylori status and Lanza score. The
The mean ulcer-healing rate with a 7-day treat-
H. pylori-positive patients were randomized to
ment was 91% vs. 92% when PPI was prolonged
receive aspirin + eradication therapy or aspirin
2005 Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Helicobacter, 10 (Suppl. 1), 26–33
+ placebo. Endoscopic reassessment was done
users. The risk of PU, adjusted for age, gender,
4 months after the onset of aspirin or when
H. pylori infection, and antisecretory drug use was
symptoms developed. Lanza scores significantly
higher in acute (GU: OR = 4.47, 95% CI = 3.19–
increased in the placebo group (0.69 ± 0.87 vs.
6.26 and DU: OR = 2.39, 95% CI = 1.73–3.31)
2.25 ± 1.3, p < .0001) and did not change in the
than chronic NSAID users (GU: OR = 2.80; 95%
H. pylori-eradicated group after aspirin treatment
CI = 1.97–3.99 and DU: OR = 1.68; 95% CI =
(0.43 ± 0.72 vs. 0.75 ± 0.93, p > .05). The authors
1.22–2.33). PPI treatment was associated with a
concluded that H. pylori eradication may prevent
reduced risk of PU in both acute (OR = 0.70, 95%
medium-dose aspirin-induced gastroduodenal
CI = 0.24–2.04) and chronic (OR = 0.32, 95%
mucosal injury [10]. A study assessing the
CI = 0.15–0.67) NSAID/aspirin users. PPI treat-
prevalence of H. pylori infection in patients with
ment resulted in an absolute risk reduction of PU
perforated PUD, and comparing it with the
by 36.6% in acute and 34.6% in chronic NSAID/
prevalence in patients with an uncomplicated ulcer
aspirin users. Authors suggested that PPI cotreat-
showed that the mean prevalence of H. pylori
ment is advisable in symptomatic elderly patients
infection in patients with perforated PU is, overall,
who need to be treated with NSAIDs or aspirin
only about 60%, which contrasts with the 90–
even for a short period of time [14].
100% figure usually reported in noncomplicatedulcer disease. However, the most important factor
H. pylori and Non-ulcer Dyspepsia
associated with H. pylori-negative perforated PUis NSAID use, and if this factor is excluded,
Functional or non-ulcer dyspepsia (NUD) is
prevalence of infection is almost 90%, similar to
defined as persistent or recurrent pain/discomfort
that found in patients with nonperforating ulcer
in the upper abdomen, where no structural
disease. In the multivariate analysis, NSAID intake
explanation for the symptoms is found. Both
was the only variable that correlated with PU
Maastricht 2–2000 and Maastricht 3–2005
perforation (OR = 3.6; 95% CI = 1.3–10) [11]. A
Consensus statements advise the eradication of
prospective cohort study evaluating the interac-
H. pylori in patients with NUD based on the
tion of H. pylori and NSAIDs and how these two
evidence of the meta-analysis. Seventeen rand-
factors influence the expression of COX-2 mRNA
omized controlled trials were included in the
in gastric antral, corpus mucosa, and GU found
most comprehensive Cochrane Collaboration
that H. pylori infection was associated with
systematic review updated in 2005. In this study
increased COX-2 expression in antral mucosa
14 trials compared antisecretory dual or triple
for both NSAID users and non-users. In NSAID
therapy with placebo antibiotics (with/without)
users, H. pylori infection was not associated
antisecretory therapy, and evaluated dyspepsia at
with increased COX-2 expression at ulcer edge.
3–12 months [15]. There was an 8% RR reduction
H. pylori infection was associated with increased
in the H. pylori eradication group (95% CI = 3–
COX-2 expression in gastric antral mucosa for
12) compared to placebo. The number needed to
both NSAID users and non-users, but not in GU,
cure one case of dyspepsia was 18 (95% CI = 12–
where the effect of NSAID inhibition plays a major
48). Therefore, H. pylori eradication has a small but
role. The authors interpreted indirectly that
statistically significant effect on H. pylori-positive
H. pylori eradication does not interfere with GU
NUD. In addition to symptomatic improvement,
healing in NSAID users [12]. A study examining
4–6.2% of patients enrolled in the NUD trials
the effect of eradication of H. pylori prior to
developed PUD during follow-up in the placebo
NSAID use, in H. pylori-infected and H. pylori-
group, therefore H. pylori eradication prevents
eradicated gerbils, followed by administration of
development of PU in NUD patients [15,16].
indomethacin and rofecoxib, showed the reduction
Several important clinical studies confirming
of gastric damage in Mongolian gerbils cured from
the superiority of test and treat strategies in the
the infection. Indeed, rofecoxib caused less severe
management of NUD were published in 2004.
gastric damage than indomethacin in H. pylori-
Lassen et al. assessed the long-term effect of a
eradicated gerbils [13]. A very important study
test and treat strategy compared with prompt
evaluated the risk of PU associated with acute and
endoscopy [17]. A total of 500 patients presenting
chronic NSAID consumption or aspirin therapy in
in primary care with dyspepsia were randomized
elderly subjects, and the influence of antisecretory
to management by H. pylori testing plus eradica-
treatment on this risk. The study included 676
tion therapy or by endoscopy. They concluded
elderly NSAID or aspirin users and 2435 non-
that on a long-term basis (a median 6.7 years after
2005 Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Helicobacter, 10 (Suppl. 1), 26–33
H. pylori and Non-malignant Diseases
randomization; range 6.1–7.3 years), a H. pylori
but we do not have enough data to determine a
test and the eradication strategy is as efficient as
prompt endoscopy for management of dyspeptic
In some studies, authors tried to identify sub-
patients in primary care and reduces the use of
groups of patients with NUD who might show a
endoscopy (mean difference 0.62 endoscopies/
major benefit from H. pylori eradication. Finnish
person; 95% CI = 0.38–0.86) and antisecretory
researchers revealed that antrum-predominant
medication (mean difference 102 defined daily
gastritis in NUD patients seems to carry an
doses/person; 95% CI = 1–205). In contrast, a
increased risk for PU [24]. An Italian group found
Finnish study of 1552 dyspeptic patients aged
that in H. pylori-positive NUD patients during
between 25 and 60 years without alarm symptom
a 1 year follow-up, DU developed in 12 (22.6%)
and followed-up for 2 years, the test-and-treat
patients with duodenal colonization and only in
strategy did not reduce the number of endoscopies.
two (1.6%) without (OR = 6.29; 95% CI = 2.4–
However, this strategy significantly improved
dyspeptic symptoms, quality of life, and reducedrisk of development of PUD [16]. Further results
H. pylori and GORD
of a large, excellent (CADET) study carried out inCanada, indeed showed that H. pylori eradication
During the last year there were ongoing dis-
is more cost-effective than short-term omeprazole
cussions concerning the relationship between
treatment for dyspepsia [18]. In another economic
H. pylori infection and gastro-esophageal reflux
analysis, a collaborative group has prospectively
disease (GORD). The prevalence of H. pylori in
registered trials comparing prompt endoscopy
GORD patients appears to be lower than in the
with a test and treat approach, with the aim of per-
general population. Also the prevalence of H. pylori
forming an individual patient data meta-analysis
is higher in non-erosive disease and gradually
of both effect and resource utilization data [19].
decreases in more severe grades of erosive esophag-
Five trials were identified, containing 1924 patients
itis and Barrett’s esophagus. Although the trend
(946 endoscopy; 978 test and treat). The RR of
is the same in the countries with a high prevalence
remaining symptomatic patients after 1 year was
of H. pylori, the proportion of infected patients
slightly reduced with endoscopy compared to the
is higher in these countries. In a 10-year cross-
test and treat (RR = 0.95; 95% CI = 0.92–0.99).
sectional study in the Netherlands, H. pylori was
However, the test and treat cost was substantially
significantly less often detected in patients with
less ($389; 95% CI: $275–$502) per patient.
reflux esophagitis or Barrett’s esophagus compared
Thus, H. pylori eradication is an appropriate
with the control group, 20 vs. 29% ( p < .001) [26].
option for patients infected with H. pylori and
In the ProGORD study, risk factor analysis was
uninvestigated/non-ulcer dyspepsia. The test and
performed on 2834 non-erosive reflux disease
treat strategy is recommended, but may not be
(NERD) and 2455 erosive reflux disease (ERD)
suitable in older patients. The age limit proposed
patients. H. pylori was present in 28.8% and
for this strategy by simulation models and expert
25.1%, respectively ( p < .05). Multivariate
opinion [20] is 55 years, but it could be decreased
analysis revealed that a higher level of education
in areas of high gastric cancer incidence. In a study
and a positive H. pylori status were associated with
from Great Britain, a cohort of 1852 consecutive
a lower risk of ERD [27]. Vakil et al. analyzed a
gastric cancer cases were investigated, and patient
large number of patients with erosive esophagitis
age > 55 years (OR = 9.5; 95% CI = 3.8–23.9) was
and established that the proportion of H. pylori
found to be a significant positive predictor for
seropositive- and seronegative-patients for each
cancer [21]. However, the study from Germany
grade of esophagitis was: grade A, 38%, 36%; grade
revealed that in NUD patients without alarm
B, 41%, 39%; grade C, 16%, 19%; and grade D,
symptoms, increasing the age threshold for prompt
5%, 6%, respectively. The rates of esophagitis
endoscopy from 45 to > 50 and > 55 years could
healing (with PPI) were not influenced by H. pylori
raise the rate of excluded patients with cancer
status [28]. The same trend was observed in a
from 2.3% to 5.5% and 8.6%, respectively [22].
series of Lithuanian patients, although the absolute
As gastric cancer is rare in dyspeptic patients,
percentage was higher; the prevalence of H. pylori
randomized controlled trials to evaluate different
was 81% in NERD, 71.4% in esophagitis grade
referral age thresholds are unfeasible. The cost
A, 55% in grade B, and 40% in grades C+D [29].
effectiveness of the test and treat strategy decrease
In a Japanese study, the overall prevalence of H.
where the prevalence of H. pylori is low [23],
pylori infection in the reflux esophagitis patient
2005 Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Helicobacter, 10 (Suppl. 1), 26–33
group (24.1%) was significantly lower than in
1.23), but not with regurgitation (OR = 1.05,
the control group (71.2%). The prevalence of
95% CI = 0.97–1.14). H. pylori eradication had
H. pylori infection in the patients with Barrett’s
no effect on the overall prevalence of heartburn
esophagus tended to be lower than that in the
(OR = 0.99, 95% CI = 0.88–1.12) or regurgitation
patients with reflux esophagitis alone (reflux
(OR = 1.04, 95% CI = 0.91–1.19) and did not
esophagitis alone, 30.0%; short segment Barrett’s
improve pre-existing symptoms of heartburn or
esophagus, 18.7%; long segment Barrett’s esopha-
reflux [35]. In the study from Hong Kong, 236
patients with GORD were randomly assigned
Further data addressing the possible negative
to omeprazole triple therapy (HpE group) or
association between H. pylori infection and eso-
omeprazole with placebo. One-year follow-up
phageal premalignant diseases and esophageal
revealed that H. pylori eradication leads to more
adenocarcinoma were also published last year.
Weston et al. found three factors significantly
In a randomized controlled trial, Kuipers et al.
associated with index diagnosis of esophageal
investigated whether H. pylori eradication influ-
high grade dysplasia or adenocarcinoma – large
ences gastritis and its sequelae during long-term
hiatal hernia, Barrett’s length (longer length),
and absence of H. pylori infection [31]. CagA-
thirty-one H. pylori-positive GORD patients
positive H. pylori strains were associated with
with long-term omeprazole maintenance therapy
less disease. In Colombian patients with Barrett’s
were randomized to either continuous PPI or an
esophagus, most were H. pylori-positive, but
H. pylori-eradication regimen. Most H. pylori-
CagA-positive infections were unusual. The data
positive GORD patients had a corpus predominant
illustrated how consistent corpus inflammation
pangastritis during omeprazole maintenance
reduces acid secretion, and prevents Barrett’s
therapy. Eradication of H. pylori induced
esophagus but only among those with abnormal
regression of corpus glandular atrophy. H. pylori
gastro-esophageal reflux barriers [32]. A Spanish
eradication did not worsen reflux disease or lead to
study also provides evidence supporting the
a need for increased omeprazole maintenance dose
independent protective role of CagA-positive
[37]. A randomized controlled trial was carried
H. pylori status and IL-1B and ILRN allele
out on 157 functional dyspeptic patients, who
polymorphisms against GORD [33]. In the meta-
were assigned to eradication therapy or placebo
analysis, the data on the role of the CagA-positive
and followed-up 12 months. Reflux esophagitis
H. pylori strains are contradictory. Several studies
developed in 6% of the eradication group and in
supported the negative association between CagA-
5% of the controls ( p > .05) [38]. A prospective
positive H. pylori strains against GORD, but were
1-year follow-up study of 255 patients with
not confirmed by others. A multitude of patients
DU was also carried out in Lithuania. H. pylori
suffer from H. pylori infection and GORD,
eradication did not significantly influence the
simultaneously. Therefore, further studies are
prevalence and incidence of reflux esophagitis,
needed to clearly answer the question whether
but there was a significantly lower prevalence of
infection with CagA-positive H. pylori strains,
GORD after successful H. pylori eradication, as
which bear a well-documented risk for gastric
patients with non-erosive GORD had been cured
cancer and PUD, is really helpful against more
[39]. In contrast, a Japanese study found that
severe reflux esophagitis and, in consequence,
10% of PUD patients developed GORD after a
perhaps protective against Barrett’s esophagus
cure of H. pylori infection. An age > 70 years
and Barrett’s adenocarcinoma [34].
was associated with the development of GORD
The data published in 2004–2005 demonstrate
[40]. Malfertheiner’s group reported that during
that eradication of H. pylori could be differently
long-term follow-up after H. pylori eradication,
associated with the development of erosive or
patients experienced improvement as frequently
non-erosive GORD in separate patient subgroups.
as deterioration of reflux symptoms. There
Harvey et al. in the population-based study
was a tendency towards improvement of reflux
(Bristol Helicobacter project) investigated more
symptoms if PUD had been the indication for
than 10,000 people, of whom the H. pylori-
eradication, but towards deterioration in patients
positive cases were randomized to placebo or to
with initial functional dyspepsia [41]. Raghunath
eradication therapy. There was a weak association
et al. in a systematic review concluded that there
between H. pylori infection and increased pre-
is no evidence to indicate that H. pylori eradica-
valence of heartburn (OR = 1.14, 95% CI = 1.05–
tion in DU disease provokes reflux esophagitis
2005 Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Helicobacter, 10 (Suppl. 1), 26–33
H. pylori and Non-malignant Diseases
or worsens heartburn; and there are insufficient
References
data to draw firm conclusions about the impactof H. pylori in patients with reflux esophagitis
1 Lu H, Hsu PI, Graham DY, Yamaoka Y. Duodenal
ulcer promoting gene of Helicobacter pylori.
Although the prevalence of H. pylori is lower
Gastroenterology 2005;128:833–48.
2 de Jonge R, Kuipers EJ, Langeveld SC, Loffeld RJ,
in GORD patients, the pathogenesis of this
Stoof J, van Vliet AH, Kusters JG. The Helico-
phenomenon remains unclear. There are data
bacter pylori plasticity region locus jhp0947–
about the important role of hiatal hernia in the
jhp0949 is associated with duodenal ulcer disease
development of GORD. In a Japanese study,
and interleukin-12 production in monocyte cells.
there was a high incidence of reflux esophagitis
FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 2004;41:161–7.
after successful H. pylori eradication therapy in
3 Lu CC, Sheu BS, Chen TW, Yang HB, Hung KH,
dyspeptic patients. This incidence of reflux
Kao AW, Chuang CH, Wu JJ. Host TNF-alpha-
esophagitis was closely associated with the
presence and degree of hiatal hernia and with the
polymorphisms determine the risk of benign
decrease in gastric juice pH [43]. Fallone’s group
ulceration after H. pylori infection. Am J Gastro-
from Canada in the prospective, double-blind
4 Rosenstock SJ, Jorgensen T, Bonnevie O,
Andersen LP. Does Helicobacter pylori infection
quantifying measures including validated symp-
explain all socio-economic differences in peptic
tom severity scores, endoscopy, and a 24-hour
ulcer incidence? Genetic and psychosocial
pH metry, that there exist no clinically significant
markers for incident peptic ulcer disease in a large
differences in clinical or laboratory-related GORD
cohort of Danish adults. Scand J Gastroenterol
manifestations between H. pylori-infected and
-non-infected GORD patients [44]. Axon pro-
5 Ford A, Delaney B, Forman D, Moayyedi P.
posed a hypothesis suggesting that the increased
Eradication therapy for peptic ulcer disease in
prevalence of GORD is a result of rising acid
Helicobacter pylori positive patients. Cochrane
secretion in the general population, which, in
Database Syst Rev 2004;4:CD003840.
turn, is a consequence of the increased linear
6 Gisbert JP, Pajares JM. Systematic review and
meta-analysis: is 1-week proton pump inhibitor-
height (a predictor of acid secretion). The greater
based triple therapy sufficient to heal peptic ulcer?
acid secretion could also explain the decline in
Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2005;21:795–804.
the prevalence of H. pylori and perhaps account
7 Gisbert JP, Khorrami S, Carballo F, Calvet X,
for the inverse relationship between H. pylori
Gene E, Dominguez-Munoz JE. H. pylori eradi-
cation therapy vs. antisecretory non-eradicationtherapy (with or without long-term maintenanceantisecretory therapy) for the prevention of
Conclusions
recurrent bleeding from peptic ulcer. Cochrane
Eradication of H. pylori is indicated for all
Database Syst Rev 2004;2:CD004062.
patients with nonmalignant diseases associated
8 Papatheodoridis GV, Papadelli D, Cholongitas E,
with this pathogen. However, its effect is variable,
Vassilopoulos D, Mentis A, Hadziyannis SJ. Effect of Helicobacter pylori infection on the risk
ranging from the highest benefit in the cure of
of upper gastrointestinal bleeding in users of
PUD to a small benefit in patients with NUD.
nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Am J Med
Management of patients with uninvestigated
dyspepsia in primary care using test and treat
9 Adamopoulos AB, Efstathiou SP, Tsioulos DI,
strategy is still cost-effective even in developed
countries. However, the cost-effectiveness of
Mountokalakis TD. Bleeding duodenal ulcer:
this strategy decreases where the prevalence of
comparison between Helicobacter pylori positive
H. pylori is low, but we do not have enough data
and Helicobacter pylori negative bleeders. Dig
to determine a cut-off. The test and treat strategy
may not be suitable in older patients, but the age
10 Giral A, Ozdogan O, Celikel CA, Tozun N,
threshold for prompt endoscopy is still debatable.
Ulusoy NB, Kalayci C. Effect of Helicobacterpylori eradication on anti-thrombotic dose aspirin-
In developed countries, H. pylori eradication does
induced gastroduodenal mucosal injury. J Gastro-
not cause GORD, however, a negative association
enterol Hepatol 2004;19:773–7.
between H. pylori and GORD does exist espe-
11 Gisbert JP, Legido J, Garcia-Sanz I, Pajares JM.
cially in Asia, but the nature of this relationship
Helicobacter pylori and perforated peptic ulcer
prevalence of the infection and role of non-steroidal
2005 Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Helicobacter, 10 (Suppl. 1), 26–33
anti-inflammatory drugs. Dig Liver Dis 2004;36:
23 Bytzer P. Diagnostic approach to dyspepsia. BestPract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2004;18:681–93.
24 Heikkinen M, Vornanen M, Hollmen S, Farkkila M.
Chen GH. The interaction of H. pylori infection
Prognostic significance of antrum-predominant
and NSAIDs in cyclooxygenase-2 mRNA expres-
gastritis in functional dyspepsia. Scand J Gastro-
sion in gastric antral, corpus mucosa, and gastric
ulcer. J Clin Gastroenterol 2005;39:50–5.
25 Pietroiusti A, Luzzi I, Gomez MJ, Magrini A,
13 Chang CC, Chen SH, Lien GS, Lou HY, Hsieh CR,
Bergamaschi A, Forlini A, Galante A. Helicobacter
Fang CL, Pan S. Eradication of Helicobacter pyloripylori duodenal colonization is a strong risk factor
significantly reduced gastric damage in nonsteroidal
for the development of duodenal ulcer. Aliment
anti-inflammatory drug-treated Mongolian gerbils. Pharmacol Ther 2005;21:909–15. World J Gastroenterol 2005;11:104–8.
26 Loffeld RJ, van der Putten AB. Helicobacter
14 Pilotto A, Franceschi M, Leandro G, Paris F,
pylori and gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: a
Cascavilla L, Longo MG, Niro V, Andriulli A,
cross-sectional epidemiological study. Neth J
Scarcelli C, Di Mario F. Proton-pump inhibitors
reduce the risk of uncomplicated peptic ulcer in
27 Labenz J, Jaspersen D, Kulig M, Leodolter A,
elderly either acute or chronic users of aspirin/
Lind T, Meyer-Sabellek W, Stolte M, Vieth M,
non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Aliment
Willich S, Malfertheiner P. Risk factors for erosive
Pharmacol Ther 2004;20:1091–7.
esophagitis: a multivariate analysis based on the
15 Delaney B, Harris A, Innes M, Oakes R, Wilson S,
ProGERD study initiative. Am J Gastroenterol
Roalfe A, Bennett C, Forman D. Eradication of
Helicobacter pylori for non-ulcer dyspepsia.
28 Vakil NB, Traxler BM, Levine D. Symptom
Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005;1:CD002096.
response and healing of erosive esophagitis
16 Farkkila M, Sarna S, Valtonen V, Sipponen P,
with proton-pump inhibitors in patients with
PROSPER Study Group. Does the ‘test-and-treat’
Helicobacter pylori infection. Am J Gastroenterol
strategy work in primary health care for manage-
ment of uninvestigated dyspepsia? A prospective
29 Jonaitis LV, Kiudelis G, Kupcinskas L. Charac-
two-year follow-up study of 1552 patients. Scand
teristics of patients with erosive and nonerosive
J Gastroenterol 2004;39:327–35.
GERD in high-Helicobacter-pylori prevalence
17 Lassen AT, Hallas J, Schaffalitzky de Muckadell
region. Dis Esophagus 2004;17:223–7.
OB. Helicobacter pylori test and eradicate versus
30 Abe Y, Ohara S, Koike T, Sekine H, Iijima K,
prompt endoscopy for management of dyspeptic
Kawamura M, Imatani A, Kato K, Shimosegawa T.
patients: 6.7 year follow up of a randomised trial.
The prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection and
the status of gastric acid secretion in patients with
18 Chiba N, Veldhuyzen Van Zanten SJ, Escobedo S,
Barrett’s esophagus in Japan. Am J Gastroenterol
Grace E, Lee J, Sinclair P, Barkun A, Armstrong D,
Thomson AB. Economic evaluation of Helicobacter
31 Weston AP, Sharma P, Mathur S, Banerjee S,
pylori eradication in the CADET-Hp randomized
Jafri AK, Cherian R, McGregor D, Hassanein RS,
controlled trial of H. pylori-positive primary care
Hall M. Risk stratification of Barrett’s esophagus:
patients with uninvestigated dyspepsia. Aliment
updated prospective multivariate analysis. Am JPharmacol Ther 2004;19:349–58. Gastroenterol 2004;99:1657–66.
19 Ford AC, Qume M, Moayyedi P, Arents NL,
32 Kudo M, Gutierrez O, El-Zimaity HM, Cardona H,
Delaney BC. Helicobacter pylori “test and treat” or
Barrett’s oesophagus in Colombia, a country with
endoscopy for managing dyspepsia: an individual
a high prevalence of gastric cancer. J Clin Pathol
patient data meta-analysis. Gastroenterology
33 Queiroz DM, Guerra JB, Rocha GA, Rocha AM,
20 Talley NJ, Vakil N, Delaney B, Marshall B,
Santos A, De Oliveira AG, Cabral MM, Nogueira
Bytzer P, Engstrand L, de Boer W, Jones R,
Malfertheiner P, Agreus L. Management issues in
morphic genes and Helicobacter pylori cagA
dyspepsia: current consensus and controversies.
strains decrease the risk of reflux esophagitis. Scand J Gastroenterol 2004;39:913–8. Gastroenterology 2004;127:73–9.
21 Kapoor N, Bassi A, Sturgess R, Bodger K. Predic-
34 Jakobs R, Riemann JF. cagA-positive Helicobacter
tive value of alarm features in a rapid access upper
pylori strains and gastro-oesophageal reflux disease:
gastrointestinal cancer service. Gut 2005;5:40–
still puzzling? Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2004;
22 Schmidt N, Peitz U, Lippert H, Malfertheiner P.
35 Harvey RF, Lane JA, Murray LJ, Harvey IM,
Missing gastric cancer in dyspepsia. Aliment
Donovan JL, Nair P; Bristol Helicobacter Project. Pharmacol Ther 2005;21:813–20.
Randomised controlled trial of effects of Helico-
2005 Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Helicobacter, 10 (Suppl. 1), 26–33
H. pylori and Non-malignant Diseasesbacter pylori infection and its eradication on
Arakawa T. Prevalence of symptomatic gastro-
heartburn and gastro-oesophageal reflux: Bristol
oesophageal reflux disease in Japanese patients
Helicobacter project. BMJ 2004;328:1388–9.
with peptic ulcer disease after eradication of
36 Wu JC, Chan FK, Ching JY, Leung WK, Hui Y,
Helicobacter pylori infection. Aliment Pharmacol
Leong R, Chung SC, Sung JJ. Effect of Helico-Ther 2004;20 (Suppl 1):107–11. bacter pylori eradication on treatment of gastro-
41 Peitz U, Raps S, Plein K, Leodolter A, Hotz Dagger
oesophageal reflux disease: a double blind,
J, Malfertheiner P. Long-term course of reflux
placebo controlled, randomised trial. Gut
symptoms following Helicobacter pylori eradica-
tion. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 2004;129:671–5.
37 Kuipers EJ, Nelis GJ, Klinkenberg-Knol EC,
42 Raghunath AS, Hungin AP, Wooff D, Childs S.
et al. Cure of Helicobacter pylori infection in
Systematic review: the effect of Helicobacter
patients with reflux oesophagitis treated with long
pylori and its eradication on gastro-oesophageal
term omeprazole reverses gastritis without exac-
reflux disease in patients with duodenal ulcers or
erbation of reflux disease: results of a randomised
reflux oesophagitis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther
controlled trial. Gut 2004;53:12–20.
38 Ott EA, Mazzoleni LE, Edelweiss MI, et al.
43 Inoue H, Imoto I, Taguchi Y, Kuroda M,
Helicobacter pylori eradication does not cause
reflux oesophagitis in functional dyspeptic patients:
Adachi Y. Reflux esophagitis after eradication of
a randomized, investigator-blinded, placebo-
Helicobacter pylori is associated with the degree of
controlled trial. Aliment Pharmacol Ther
hiatal hernia. Scand J Gastroenterol 2004;39:1061–5.
44 Fallone CA, Barkun AN, Mayrand S, Wakil G,
39 Kupcinskas L, Jonaitis L, Kiudelis G. A 1 year
Friedman G, Szilagyi A, Wheeler C, Ross D.
follow-up study of the consequences of Helico-
There is no difference in the disease severity of
bacter pylori eradication in duodenal ulcer patients:
gastro-oesophageal reflux disease between patients
unchanged frequency of erosive oesophagitis
infected and not infected with Helicobacter pylori.
and decreased prevalence of non-erosive gastro-
Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2004;20:761–8.
oesophageal reflux disease. Eur J Gastroenterol
45 Axon AT. Personal view: to treat or not to treat?
Helicobacter pylori and gastro-oesophageal reflux
40 Yamamori K, Fujiwara Y, Shiba M, Watanabe T,
disease – an alternative hypothesis. Aliment Phar-
Tominaga K, Oshitani N, Matsumoto T, Higuchi K,
2005 Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Helicobacter, 10 (Suppl. 1), 26–33
SG–The Test Mark This mark is awarded to those products only, which meet the for low pollutant stringent limit values and parameters for harmful substances set forth Leather Products Version 09/2006 All SG limit values are in general much lower than the statutory Responsibility The SG mark confirms that there is no danger to health according to Natural materials such as l
INTRODUCTION Professionals tend to refer to this group of illnesses as "puerperal psychoses". "Puerperal" means the six weeks after having a baby and "psychosis" a serious mental illness. So "Puerperal psychosis" means a serious mental illness, developing in a woman shortly after she has given birth. This is often a shock, because there is no obvious