Artisan Toric Phakic Intraocular Lens for the
JOSE L. GU ¨ ELL, MD, PHD, MERCEDES VA´ZQUEZ, MD, FRANCOISE MALECAZE, MD, PHD, FELICIDAD MANERO, MD, OSCAR GRIS, MD, FORTINO VELASCO, MD, HELENE HULIN, MD, AND JAUNE PUJOL, MD, PHD
● PURPOSE: To evaluate efficacy, predictability, and Ophthalmol 2003;136:442– 447. 2003 by Elsevier safety of Artisan toric phakic intraocular lens (Ophtec, Inc. All rights reserved.) Groningen, The Netherlands) implantation for the cor- rection of astigmatism higher than 2 diopters. ● DESIGN: Interventional case series.
duced astigmatism has advanced rapidly in the last
● METHODS: This prospective study included 27 eyes of
decade. Astigmatic keratotomy, photorefractive as-
16 patients with a mean preoperative spherical equivalent
tigmatic keratectomy, laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis
of –11.78 ؎ 6.24 diopters and a mean preoperative
(LASIK), photothermal keratoplasty techniques, cataract
astigmatism of ؊3.43 ؎ 0.81. The Artisan phakic
or clear lens extraction surgery with toric intraocular lens
intraocular lens was inserted in the anterior chamber
(IOL) implantation, phakic toric intraocular lenses, or a
through a posterior corneal incision; the technique is
combination of these procedures are the main techniques
similar to the implantation of the classical Artisan lens, but in these cases it is particularly important to secure
The various procedures for the surgical management of
the lens accurately in the correct axis. The main param-
high levels of astigmatism have had their limitations. eters evaluated in this study were uncorrected visual
Combined procedures, such as astigmatic keratotomy plus
acuity, best-corrected visual acuity, refraction, and en-
photorefractive astigmatic astigmatic kera-
dothelial cell count.
● RESULTS: Twelve months after the implantation of the
keratotomy plus laser-assisted in situ and
Artisan toric phakic intraocular lens, 62.90% of the eyes
astigmatic keratotomy with cataract and a proce-
were within ؎0.50 diopters. of emmetropia and 96.20%
dure termed keratolenticuloplasty have been tried in these
within ؎1.0 diopters. Seventy percent of the eyes gained
cases to improve efficacy and predictability. 1 or more Snellen lines from their preoperative best-
In young patients with high ametropia and high astig-
corrected visual acuity, and 11.11% lost 1 Snellen line.
matism, toric phakic intraocular lenses may be an alterna-
Mean endothelial cell count increased 2.9%. Mean of the
tive to be taken into account before other corneal
parallel and orthogonal components of cylinder correc-
refractive approaches because of its theoretical advantages
tion were 1.97 diopters and 0.10 diopters, respectively,
of reversibility and the preservation of the corneal contour. of the intended cylinder change. The mean of axis
We have been working with the Artisan lens (Ophtec,
alignment error was 10.53 degrees. No serious compli-
Gronigen, The Netherlands), an iris-claw fixated intraoc-
cations were observed.
ular lens that is the phakic lens of our
● CONCLUSION: Artisan toric phakic intraocular lens
Currently we are using this type of lens to make toric
implantation appears to be a safe and predictable method
corrections. Our inclusion and exclusion criteria are the
for the correction of high levels of astigmatism.
same than for the standard Artisan lens.
Originally, the reasons to work with this intraocular lens
(IOL) were its location of placement in the eye, far from
Accepted for publication March 4, 2003.
the corneal endothelium and avoiding the posterior cham-
From the IMO Instituto de Microcirugı´a Ocular, Barcelona, Spain
ber, and its larger optical zone compared with other
(J.L.G., M.V., O.G., F.V.); Service Ophtalmologie, CHU Toulouse,
anterior chamber phakic IOLs used for the same range of
Toulouse, France (F.M., H.H.); Centre de Desenvolupament de Sensors,Instrumentacio i Sistemas (CD6), Universitat Politecnica de Catalunya,
corrections. An important optical advantage is that, be-
cause of its fixation characteristics, centering the lens over
Inquires to Jose´ L. Gu¨ell, MD, PhD, Instituto de Microcirugı´a Ocular
the pupil is dependent on surgeon ability rather than angle
(IMO), 08022, Barcelona, Spain; fax: (ϩ34) 93-4171301; e-mail:[email protected]
situation (as with angle-supported IOLs) or difficult “white
2003 BY ELSEVIER INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
to white” measurements (as with posterior chamber IOLs).
complete ophthalmologic examination was performed at
We report the results of 27 eyes implanted with the
each visit, as previously described, with the exception of
Artisan toric phakic IOLs designed to correct both spher-
the first and seventh day postoperatively, on which endo-
ical and astigmatic components of ametropia.
thelial cell count was not measured.
The Artisan IOL is a one-piece polymethylmetacrylate
(PMMA) lens. Its overall diameter is 8.5 mm, maximum
height is 1.04 mm, and optical zone diameter is 5.0 mm. The available powers for myopia vary from –3.00 to –20.00
THE STUDY DESIGN IS AN INTERVENTIONAL CASE SERIES.
D, with cylindrical correction from 1 to 7 D and, for
Two surgeons, Jose´ L. Gu¨ell at Instituto de Microcirugı´a
hyperopia, from ϩ 2.00 to ϩ 12.00 D with the same
Ocular de Barcelona, Spain, and F. Malecaze at Service
cylindrical correction as for myopia.
Ophthalmologie, CHU Toulouse, France, performed the
The dioptric power of the lens was calculated with the
procedures. We enrolled 27 eyes of 16 patients in this
patient’s refractive error, the anterior chamber depth, and
prospective study (6 men, 10 women), aged from 28 to 50
There are two available models for correcting, with a
The preoperative spherical equivalent ranged from
similar surgical technique, any astigmatic axis: a toric
ϩ6.00 diopters (D) to –19.50 diopters (D) (mean, –11.78
Artisan phakic IOL with a cylinder axis at 0 degrees
Ϯ 6.24) and preoperative astigmatism ranged from Ϫ2.25
(model A) and a toric Artisan phakic IOL with a cylinder
to Ϫ4.75 (mean, –3.43 Ϯ 0.90). Preoperative uncorrected
axis at 90 degrees (model B) with respect to the position of
visual acuity was lower than 20/400 in all of the eyes, and
the haptics. When the axis of the cylinder is between 0
preoperative best-corrected visual acuity was Ն20/40 in
and 45 degrees or 135 and 180 degrees, model A is
recommended; when the axis of the cylinder is between 45
The study included a consecutive series of patients who,
and 135 degrees, model B is recommended.
for medical, professional, or personal requirements, at-
The procedure was similar to standard Artisan IOL
tained unsatisfactory correction with spectacles or contact
implantation, but in these cases it was important to secure
lenses; had a stable refraction for at least 1 year; had
the lens accurately in the correct axis to avoid induced
astigmatism Ͼ Ϫ2.00; and either did not want refractive
astigmatism. The enclavation sites were preoperatively
surgery or it was contraindicated for them. The study was
marked on the iris using argon laser. The limbus was also
approved by the ethical committees of Barcelona (Au-
marked, immediately before the surgery, while the patient
tonoma University) and Toulouse. All patients were fully
was sitting upright at the ophthalmometer.
informed of the details and possible risks of the procedure
We generally used a superior approach and retrobulbar
in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration, and written
anesthesia (4 cc of a proportional combination of mepiva-
informed consent was obtained for each patient.
Exclusion criteria were as follows: anterior segment
caine 2% and bupivacaine 0.75%). The first plane of a
pathology, inadequate eyelid closure, uveitis, previous
5.2-mm-long posterior vascular corneal incision and two
corneal or intraocular surgery, monocular status, systemic
vertical paracentesis were performed. These last two were
diseases (such as autoimmune, connective tissue disease,
located for an easy iris enclavation, accordingly, to the
atopia, or diabetes), chronic treatment with corticosteroids
cylinder axis where the IOL had to be placed. After the
or any immunosuppressive treatment or state, pregnancy,
intracameral injection of acetylcholine and viscoelastic
endothelial cell counts of less than 2,200 cell/mm2, and an
material through the paracentesis, the second plane of the
anterior chamber central depth less than 3.2 mm.
incision was performed, opening the anterior chamber.
Examinations were performed by M. Vazquez and H.
The lens was then completely introduced in one step to
Hulin. The preoperative evaluation included uncorrected
avoid any contact of the front part of the IOL with the
visual acuity and best-corrected visual acuity, manifest and
crystalline lens. Under viscoelastic protection, the IOL was
cycloplegic refraction, slit-lamp microscope examination,
then rotated until the appropriate axis was reached. The
applanation tonometry, keratometry, and indirect oph-
IOL was fixated with a blunt 30-G blended needle,
thalmoscopy. The subjective response for satisfaction was
grasping, through both paracentesis, the iris into both
rated on a scale from 1 to 5 (1 ϭ very poor, 2 ϭ poor, 3 ϭ
“claws.” Once the proper axis alignment and centering
moderate, 4 ϭ good, and 5 ϭ excellent). The symptoms such
over the pupil was confirmed, a peripheral slit iridotomy at
as glare and halos were rated as 1 ϭ very intense, 2 ϭ
12 o’clock was performed. Viscoelastic material was ex-
intense, 3 ϭ moderate, 4 ϭ few, and 5 ϭ none. Comple-
changed with balanced salt solution through our irrigation-
mentary examinations were also required, including axial
aspiration automatic system, and the incision was closed
length and anterior chamber depth, videokeratography,
with five interrupted 10-0 nylon sutures. The correct
tension and distribution of the sutures were confirmed with
Postoperative evaluations were programmed at 24 hours,
a Maloney qualitative keratometer. Postoperative treat-
1 week, and 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery. A
ment included tobramycin and dexamethasone four times
per day and timolol 0.5% twice a day for 3 weeks. Sutureremoval was started at the first postoperative month,taking into account postoperative refractive and topo-graphic astigmatism.
Change in spherical equivalent manifest refraction was
where DSE is change in spherical equivalent, SE and SE
are spherical equivalent at preoperative and postoperativeexamination, respectively.
Cylindrical refractions were represented as double-angle
FIGURE 1. Scattergram shows the preoperative manifiest spherical equivalent refraction vs the induced change 1 year
vectors, which can be decomposed into two perpendicular
after Artisan toric phakic intraocular lens implantation.
components in rectangular coordinates as follows:
Ͼ 90, then g ϭ b Ϫ b
Ͻ Ϫ90, then g ϭ b Ϫ b
otherwise, g ϭ b Ϫ b
ϭ axis of intended cylinder change.
Where X is the cardinal component, Y ϭ is the oblique
A positive g indicates a counterclockwise (CCW) axis
component, A is the cylinder magnitude in diopters, a ϭ
deviation and a negative g indicates a clockwise (CW) axis
Cylinder axis in degree. X is positive for against-the-rule
deviation. By our convention, the axis of intended cylinder
astigmatism and negative for with-the-rule astigmatism. Y
correction was always the same, from the consensus pre-
is positive for a positive cylinder at 45 and negative for a
positive cylinder at 135. The positive cylinder convention
The cylinder changes can be decomposed into two
rectangular components referenced to the axis of intended
Changes in cylindrical refractions are computed in
where DP is the component of cylinder change parallel to
where DX is the change in cardinal component of astig-
the axis of intended correction and DO is the component
matism, X is the postoperative cardinal components, X
of cylinder change orthogonal to the axis of intended
the preoperative cardinal components, DY the change in
correction. The terms parallel and orthogonal refer to
oblique component of astigmatism, Y the postoperative
orientations in the double-angle vector plot.
The formulae for the decomposition of astigmatism
vectors into cardinal and oblique components are adapted
Conversion from rectangular to polar coordinates is
Concerning quantitative data, the comparisons between
pre- and postoperative periods were performed using the
DA ϭ ͑DX2 ϩ DY2͒1/2
Student t test for paired data. Comparisons for percentages
If DX ϭ 0, then if DY Ͼ 0, b ϭ 45, otherwise b ϭ 135.
were performed using the 2 and McNemar tests.
If DX Ͼ 0 and DY Ͼ 0, b ϭ 0.5 arctan (DY/DX);if DX Ͼ 0 and DY Ͻ 0, b ϭ 0.5 {arctan(DY/DX) ϩ 360};
if DX Ͻ 0, b ϭ 0.5 {arctan(DY/DX) ϩ 180},
MEAN PREOPERATIVE SPHERICAL EQUIVALENT REFRAC-
where DA is the magnitude of cylinder change, and b is the
tion and astigmatism were –11.78 Ϯ 6.24 (ϩ 6.00 to
–19.50) and –3.48 Ϯ 0.81 (Ϫ2.25 to Ϫ4.50), respectively.
Deviation g of the axis of the actual cylinder change
Mean postoperative spherical equivalent refraction and
from the axis of intended change is computed as follows:
astigmatism were – 0.58 Ϯ 0.64 (Ϫ1.25 to 0) and – 0.66 Ϯ
FIGURE 2. The bar graph depicts the change in best-corrected visual acuity from preoperative to the 1-year postoperative examinations in terms of change in the number of Snellen lines.
0.57 (Ϫ1.00 to 0), respectively, at 12 months
after the surgery. A satisfactory residual
peared early, at the first month, and an
refraction had already been obtained as early
One year after the surgery, 96.20% of the
within Ϯ1.00 D of emmetropia, and 17 eyes
ing the astigmatism, 85.50% of the eyes were
D after IOL implantation and 8 eyes (30%)
(P ϭ .21). There were no significant
tude of cylindrical power error was 0.74 D,
constructed a formal statistical analysis of the null hypoth-
pigmentary dispersion, pupillary block, or retinal complica-
esis in which postsurgical power vectors were equal to zero.
tions occurred during the follow-up period
The results of these tests, conducted at the 0.01 level,
All the patients were highly satisfied with the procedure.
indicated that neither astigmatism components are signif-
Mean subjective response for satisfaction and symptoms
such as glare and halos was 4.0 at 12 months after the
Preoperative uncorrected visual acuity was less than 20/400
surgery, using the scale described previously.
in all cases; its evolution during the first postoperative year isshown in At 1 year, about two thirds (63%) of theeyes had an uncorrected visual acuity of 20/40 or better. The
maximal efficacy was observed as soon as the third month(Table 1), once the sutures had been removed.
THE CORRECTION OF HIGH ASTIGMATISM IS STILL A CON-
With regard to best-corrected visual acuity, as shown in
troversial issue. Corneal refractive (nonreversible) surgery
the safety index (ratio of mean postoperative
cannot adequately correct high myopia and astigmatism
TABLE 1. Comparison of the Visual Acuity and Refractive Outcomes at Various Intervals
After Artisan Toric Phakic Intraocular Lens Implantation
UCVA ϭ Uncorrected visual acuity; BCVA ϭ best-corrected visual acuity; D ϭ diopters. *Safety index ϭ ratio of mean postoperative BCVA over mean preoperative BCVA. TABLE 2. Statistical Summary of the Decomposition of TABLE 4. Postsurgical Axis Error
Astigmatism Vectors Into Parallel and Orthogonal
DP ϭ component of cylinder change parallel to the axis of
intended correction; DO ϭ component of cylinder change or-
Artisan implantation. The central effective optical zone
thogonal to the axis of intended correction.
will always be smaller in the first two procedures, and thuspatients may suffer more frequently from complains such asglare and halos, especially in dim lighting
TABLE 3. Statistical Summary of the Magnitude of
Therefore, correction with a toric lens may be an interest-
ing alternative, even though this means correcting acorneal astigmatism that theoretically could be treated by
The refractive results of this study were excellent. At 1
year, 96% (25 eyes) of the eyes were within Ϯ1.00 D of
emmetropia and 63% (17 eyes) were within Ϯ0.50 D. These refractive results appeared early in the postoperative
SD ϭ standard deviation; SEM ϭ standard error of the mean.
period; similar values had already been attained as early asthe third month. With corneal refractive surgery it has notalways been possible to attain such results and combined
levels without decreasing the central optical zone and thus
procedures or upgraded profiles or techniques had to be
limiting the quality of Combined procedures
employed to improve effiIn contrast, all patients in
such as astigmatic keratotomy plus and better and
our study noted that they were highly satisfied with the
improved ablational profiles and techniques (positive cyl-
inder, cross cylinder) have emerged to achieve the latter.
Seventy percent of the eyes in this study gained one or
With the implantation of the Artisan toric phakic IOL,
more lines of their preoperative best-corrected visual
however, it is theoretically possible to obtain good results
acuity. Other have reported this gain in visual
acuity after phakic IOL implantation because of the
Artisan toric phakic IOL implantation allows correction
increase in the size of the retinal image.
of myopia up to Ϫ20.00 and of astigmatism up to 7.00 D,
Damage to the endothelium is one of the main concerns
with an optical zone of 5 mm. Conversely, it is a reversible
with anterior chamber phakic IOL implantation. This
and adjustable procedure, hence the lens may be ex-
could be the result of the surgery itself or of the presence
planted, exchanged, or adjusted with corneal refractive
of a foreign body in the anterior chamber (chronic inflam-
surgery, primarily LASIK. Another advantage of this
matory or mechanical hypothesis). Nevertheless, we ob-
technique is the possibility of attaining better vision
served a paradoxical increase (ϩ2.90%) in the mean
because the original corneal contour is preserved. Perform-
endothelial cell count. This may be due to the reproduc-
ing a 6-mm optical zone arcuate keratotomy or 5-mm
ibility of the technique, despite the fact that we took
optical zone LASIK is different from a 5-mm optical zone
extreme care to eliminate bias (eight measures at each
exploration time per patient). It may also be explained by
3. Guell JL, Vazquez M. Correction of high astigmatism with
the long-term daily use by most of our patients of toric soft
astigmatic keratotomy combined with laser in situ kerato-
contact lenses or rigid gas permeable contact lenses until
mileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg 2000;26:960 –966.
4. Kershner RM. Keratolenticuloplasty: arcuate keratotomy for
the surgery was performed (13 of 16 patients). Despite this,
cataract surgery and astigmatism. J Cataract Refract Surg
a long-term follow-up is essential with any type of anterior
chamber lenses to assess the stability of endothelial cell
5. Gu¨ell JL, Vazquez M, Gris O, De Muller A, Manero F.
count and morphology. Budo and reported an
Combined surgery to correct high myopia: iris claw phakic
endothelial cell loss of 0.7% per year between 2 and 3 years
intraocular lens and laser in situ keratomileusis. J Refract
following a mean loss of 7.1% during the first year, possibly
6. Gu¨ell JL, Vazquez M. Adjustable refractive surgery: 6-mm
associated with the initial surgical trauma. Similar results
Artisan lens plus laser in situ keratomileusis for the correc-
have been described by other authors, including A
tion of high myopia. Ophthalmology 2001;108:945–952.
more complete follow-up of these patients (5 to 10 years)
7. Van der Heijde GL, Fechner PU, Worst JGF. Optische
compared with an age-matched control group would be
Konsequenzen del Implantation einer negativen Intraokular-
important in assessing the safety of these lenses and
linse bei myopen Patienten. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd
considering their use as an standard either in myopia alone
8. Holladay JT, Dudeja DR, Koch DD. Evaluating and report-
ing astigmatism for individual and aggregate data. J Cataract
We had no intraoperative or postoperative complica-
tions. This is probably related to our experience with this
9. Thibos LN, Wheeler W, Horner D. Power vectors: an
type of implant. We must point out that, from our point of
application of Fourier analysis to the description and statis-
view, a proper surgical training is especially important with
tical analysis of refractive error. Optom Vis Sci 1997;74:367–
this type of IOL implantation and especially with the toric
10. Naeser K, Beherens JK, Naeser EV. Quantitative assessment
model. In our study group, best-corrected visual acuity was
of corneal astigmatic surgery: Expanding the polar values
equal or better compared with the preoperative values,
concept. J Cataract Refract Surg 1994;20:162–168.
which favors the procedure; only three cases lost 1 Snellen
11. Alpins NA. Vector analysis of astigmatism changes by
line with respect to their best-corrected visual acuity. As
flattening, steepening and torque. J Cataract Refract Surg
with other no postoperative glaucoma has been
observed, with the exception of a mild, transient early
12. Huang D, Stulting D, Carr J, et al. Multiple regression and
vector analyses of laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia and
episode of elevated intraocular pressure. The problem
astigmatism. J Refract Surg 1999;15:538 –550.
resolved with discontinuation of topical corticosteroids.
13. Chv´ez S, Chayet A, Celikkol L, Parker J, Celikkol G,
Other complications reported in the literature, such as
Feldman ST. Analysis of astigmatism keratotomy with a 5.0
mm optical clear zone. Am J Ophthalmol 1996;121:65–76.
14. Danjoux JP, Fraenkel G, Lawless MA, Rogers C. Treatment
of myopic astigmatism with the Summit Apex Plus excimer
Artisan toric phakic IOL implantation appears to be a
laser. J Cataract Surg 1997;23:1472–1479.
15. Uozato H, Guyton DL. Centering corneal surgical proce-
suitable option for patients with high levels of myopia or
dures. Am J Ophthalmol 1987;103:264 –275.
hyperopia and astigmatism and who otherwise have nor-
16. Pe´rez-Santonja JJ, Bueno J, Zato MA. Surgical correction of
mal ophthalmologic examinations. Nevertheless a long-
high myopia in phakic eyes with Worst-Fechner myopia
term follow-up of these patients will provide the last word.
intraocular lenses. J Refract Surg 1997;13:268 –284.
This technique has been helpful to us in the correction of
17. Fechner PU, Wichmann W. Correction of myopia by im-
postpenetrating keratoplasty ammetropia. In any case, we
plantation of minus optic (Worst iris claw) lenses into theanterior chamber of phakic eyes. Eur J Implant Surg 1993;5:
favor this approach over aggressive irreversible corneal
surgery, combined or alone, in correcting this high
18. Budo C, Hessloehl JC, Izak M, et al. Multicenter study of the
ametropic group. From our point of view, corneal refractive
Artisan phakic intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg
surgery, customized or not, should be reserved for postop-
erative refinements until the IOL itself can be modified in
19. Menezo JL, Cisneros AL, Rodriguez-Salvador V. Endothelial
situ (Light Adjustable IOL project).
study of iris-claw phakic lens: four year follow-up. J CataractRefract Surg 1998;8:1039 –1049.
20. Krumeich JH, Daniel J, Gas R. Closed-system technique for
implantation of iris-supported negative-power intraocular
lens. J Refract Surg 1996;12:334 –340.
21. Fechner PU, Strobel J, Wicchmann W. Correction of myo-
1. Ganem S, Sidhoum B. Surgery in myopic astigmatism:
pia by implantation of a concave Worst-iris claw lens into
arciform keratotomy and PRK versus PARK. Bull Soc Belge
phakic eyes. Refract Corneal Surg 1991;7:286 –298.
22. Pe´rez-Santonja JJ, Bueno JL, Meza J, et al. Ischemic optic
2. Manche EE, Maloney RK. Astigmatism keratotomy com-
neuropathy after intraocular lens implantation to correct
bined with myopic keratomileusis in situ for compound
high myopia in a phakic patient. J Cataract Refract Surg
myopic astigmatism. Am J Ophthalmol 1996;122:18 –28.
Hum. Psychopharmacol Clin Exp 2007; 22: 217–222. Published online 13 April 2007 in Wiley InterScience(www.interscience.wiley.com) DOI: 10.1002/hup.842Metabolic differences between Asian and Caucasian patientson clozapine treatmentMythily Subramaniam1*, Chee Ng2, Siow-Ann Chong1, Rathi Mahendran1, Tim Lambert2,Elaine Pek1 and Chan Yiong Huak31Institute of Mental Health and Woodbridge Hospital,
Pharmaceutical & Medical Terminology for Pharmacy Technicians Acknowledgements Winnipeg Technical College and the Department of Labour and Immigration of Manitoba wish to express sincere appreciation to all contributors. Special acknowledgments are The Citizenship and Multicultural Division, Funding for this project has been provided by the Manitoba Labour an