Disclaimer: This newsletter, provided by ITIS, is funded by a grant from the Illinois Department of Public Health and supported by Northwestern Memorial Hospital and Northwestern University Medical School. It is for educational purposes only and is meant to summarize the information available at the time of its creation. It should be construed neither as medical advice nor opinion on any specific clinical situation. For more information on a specific clinical situation, or updated information, please consult your health care provider. The Newer SSRI Anti-Depressants and Pregnancy Volume 12, No. 1, April 2005 The prevalence of clinical depression during pregnancy has been estimated to be 7-12% by a recent meta-analysis. (Bennett et al., 2004). Additionally, in over 3000 obstetric patients screened, 20% had high scores on Centre for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (Bonari et al., 2004). Therefore, it is not surprising that the Illinois Teratogen Information Service receives many requests for information regarding pharmacological treatment of depression during pregnancy. The decision of whether or not to keep a woman on medication during pregnancy is complex. The many possible adverse effects of untreated depression must be considered. There is a growing body of literature on an association of obstetrical complications with untreated maternal depression. Women with untreated depression are also more likely to use alcohol, tobacco, and illicit drugs (Zuckerman et al., 1989). They may be less able to motivate themselves to attend prenatal appointments or follow medical advice and have poor nutrition (Bonari et al., 2004). The risk of self injury and suicide is a real concern. Thus, it is essential to consider each case individually prior to making medicine changes. While past newsletters (March 1995 and 1999) have discussed the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), Prozac, Zoloft, and Paxil, this newsletter reviews current literature regarding prenatal exposure to the newer SSRIs, Lexapro and Celexa. NonSSRIs antidepressants, Wellbutrin and Effexor, are also discussed. Lexapro (escitalopram) Escitalopram is an SSRI used in the treatment of depression. Escitalopram, marketed as Lexapro, is the active isomer of citalopram, thus the two compounds are chemically similar. Congenital anomalies Unpublished animal studies examining the effects of prenatal exposure to escitalopram have been conducted by the manufacturer (Forrest Labs). No increase in congenital anomalies was seen at doses 75X the maximum recommended human dose (MRHD) in rats. Decreased fetal body weights, delays in ossification, slightly increased offspring mortality, and signs of maternal toxicity were observed at the higher doses. To date there have been no human studies examining the effects of prenatal exposure to escitalopram. There is human data, however, about citalopram use in pregnancy, the results of which should have some application to escitalopram. Celexa (citalopram) Citalopram, marketed as Celexa, is an SSRI used to treat depression. Due to the relatively recent marketing of this medication (approved by the FDA in 1998), data examining the effects of prenatal
exposure, particularly long term development, is limited. Congenital anomalies Unpublished experimental animal studies examining the effects of prenatal exposure to citalopram have been conducted by the manufacturer (Forrest Labs). Teratogenic effects (cardiovascular and skeletal defects) were only observed at the highest doses when maternal toxicity symptoms were present. Lowered birth weights and increased offspring mortality were also present at the higher doses. No adverse effects were seen with rabbit studies with doses 5X MRHD. Two small prospective human studies have been performed examining birth outcomes following prenatal exposure to citalopram. One study prospectively followed a group of 10 women taking citalopram 20-40mg/day throughout pregnancy and one woman taking citalopram starting in the second trimester (Heikkinen et al., 2002). These women were being treated for either depression or panic disorders. There were no major malformations present and no differences in the Apgar scores or birthweight compared to a control group. Additionally, a larger prospective study from a drug recording program of the Swedish Medical Birth Registry reported the pregnancy outcomes of 531 infants prenatally exposed to SSRIs, 365 of which were exposed to citalopram (Ericson et al., 1999). This registry identifies early pregnancy exposures, but timing and dosing were poorly specified. Of those infants exposed to citalopram, there was no increase in major malformations and no pattern to any of the birth defects. The authors also noted that due to two reports to the FDA, they specifically checked but did not find any cases of optic nerve hypoplasia, although the infants were evaluated only in the perinatal period. They did find a small but significant increase in prematurity (OR 1.6) in women taking any SSRIs. It is not clear what role the medicine, maternal condition, or life style factors associated with the maternal condition played. Neonatal withdrawal Nordeng et al. (2001) described 5 possible cases of neonatal withdrawal with various SSRIs, including one case of an infant whose mother took 20mg/day of citalopram from months 5-7 and an increased dose of 30mg/day from months 7-9. The infant was born at term and had light abstinence symptoms with increased tonus in his extremities and neck, and was jittery. All symptoms, with the exception of tonus, resolved within seven days of birth (Nordeng et al., 2001). No medical treatment was needed. Laine et al. (2003) prospectively followed 20 infants exposed to the SSRIs citalopram (N=10) and Prozac (N=10) compared to control group of healthy women not receiving psychotropic medication. While they found a 4-fold increase in serotonergic symptoms (tremor, restlessness and rigidity) in SSRI-exposed infants ages 1-4 days, there were no significant differences in symptom scores when only the citalopram group was compared to the controls. No differences were found in vital signs such as blood pressure, heart rate and body temperature between the two groups, with the exception of a statistically significant increase in heart rate in the SSRI group at 2 weeks of age. No specific medical treatment was needed. Long term development Psychotropic medications alter neurotransmitter levels in the maternal brain, thus there is a theoretical risk that they can also alter the developing fetal brain. These brain alterations could potentially lead to behavioral or learning deficiencies. In the study by Heikkinen et al. 2002 (discussed previously), 11 infants who were exposed to citalopram in utero were followed until age 1 year. The body weights of all infants were normal at one year, as was the neurological development. One child could not walk at the age of 1 year, but the neurological status of this child was evaluated as normal 6 months later (Heikkinen et al., 2002). Due to
the limitation of the small sample size and limited follow up time, further investigation in this area is necessary. Wellbutrin/Zyban (bupropion) Bupropion is an aminoketone used both as an antidepressant (Wellbutrin) and as an aid in smoking cessation (Zyban). Congenital anomalies One study in rabbits only saw an increase in skeletal anomalies and delayed ossification at the highest dose when maternal toxicity was present (Tucker, 1983). This same study reported that high doses given to pregnant rats produced maternal toxicity, but that no congenital anomalies were found in the offspring. The majority of human data on pregnancy exposure is available through a bupropion pregnancy registry maintained by the manufacturer, GlaxoSmithKline. The registry prospectively collected pregnancy exposure information and outcomes since September 1997. Controls were not used. The current update of this registry (February 2004) indicated that 534 pregnancy outcomes have been prospectively analyzed with 354 live births following first trimester exposure. Of these first trimester exposures, there were 12 pregnancy outcomes resulting in birth defects (3.4%), which is not higher than the general population. However, of the 12 birth defects, 7 were isolated heart defects. Therefore there is continued study to assess an association specifically with cardiac defects. Additionally, a prospective controlled study found no increase in the rate of malformations in 136 women taking bupropion in the first trimester (Chun-Fai-Chan et al., 2005). Forty-five women took bupropion throughout pregnancy. There were 72 livebirths and no major malformations reported. Due to the small sample size this study had a 80% power to identify a 5-fold increase risk for malformations. There were also no differences in birth weight, gestational age at birth, or stillbirth compared to the controls. There was a significant increase risk for miscarriage among women taking any antidepressant or taking bupropion (12.3-15.4%) compared to a control group without depression (6.7%). In addition to the medicines, this latter finding could reflect factors with the maternal depressive condition or simply reflect an unusually low miscarriage rate in control women. Neonatal withdrawal No reports of neonatal withdrawal have been published. Long term development There are at present no published studies examining the long term effects on development in children prenatally exposed to bupropion. Effexor (venlafaxine) Venlafaxine is a bicyclic antidepressant marketed as Effexor. Congenital anomalies Unpublished animal data available from the manufacturer (Wyeth) reported no increase in malformations in the offspring of rats given up to 11 times and rabbits given up to 12X MHRD. Decreased weight and viability were noted in offspring at 10X MHRD in rats. Another study by da- Silva et al. produced similar results in rats prenatally exposed to venlafaxine (da-Silva et al., 1999). They found no increased risk for congenital malformations, but did find a slight decrease in birth weight of litters exposed to venlafaxine. Data obtained from the U.K. Drug Safety Research Unit included pregnancy outcomes for 26 live births in women who took venlafaxine during pregnancy
(Einarson et al., 2001). No major malformations were reported. A larger study by Einarson et al. (2001) prospectively collected information about birth outcomes of 150 women exposed to venlafaxine during pregnancy, 126 of which used the medication during the first trimester and 34 throughout the pregnancy. Seventy percent of the woman took 75mg venlafaxine (range: 37.5-300mg). The authors compared pregnancy outcomes of this group to two control groups, women who used SSRI’s during pregnancy and women who did not take antidepressants. Pregnancy outcomes such as the number of live births, spontaneous abortions, preterm delivery, birth weight and major malformations were examined. The pregnancy outcomes were not statistically different between the three groups for any of these factors. The results from this study are promising, but are limited by the small sample size which provides only an 80% power to detect a 4-fold increase in malformations. Neonatal withdrawal The WHO Collaborating Centre for International Drug Monitoring in Sweden described 17 reports of neonatal withdrawal syndrome, of which only 6 were regarded as potentially related (Sanz et al., 2005). An individual case report in a German journal described an infant with restlessness, hypertonia, jitteriness, irritability and poor feeding (de Moor et al., 2003). The diagnosis of neonatal withdrawal was further suspected when there was a temporary improvement after administration of low dose (1 mg) venlafaxine. After 8 days, with no further treatment, the infant’s symptoms resolved. Long term development The long term effects on development in children prenatally exposed to venlafaxine has not been studied. Summary Reproductive studies to do not suggest an increase in congenital anomalies for any of the four medications discussed, although the studies are still limited by their small sample sizes. Studies with sample sizes less than 150 women allow at most a 4 fold detection of increased risk (Einarson and Einarson, in press). Further evaluation of a possible association with bupropion and cardiac defects is still needed. Exposure to antidepressants which inhibit serotonin reuptake during the third trimester of pregnancy carries the risk of a neonatal withdrawal/serotonergic syndrome. Reported symptoms are non specific and typically self limiting. Symptoms most commonly reported include agitation, irritability, hypotonia, hypertonia, hyperreflexia, drowsiness, persistent crying, and sucking problems (Prescrire International, 2004). Small nonblinded case series suggest such findings occur in 20-30% of infants with third trimester exposure to the older SSRIs (Prozac, Paxil, and Zoloft) compared to 6-9% of control infants (Prescrire International, 2004). Individual case reports of withdrawal-like symptoms also exist for Celexa and Effexor. However, discontinuing antidepressants near delivery is controversial due to maternal and infant adverse effects with postpartum depression. Longterm studies on whether there are any effects on neurobehavioral outcomes are absent. Currently there only studies on early childhood development for Prozac and the tricyclic antidepressants. It should be noted that stopping medication is not a “no risk” option since there are concerns to a pregnancy with untreated maternal depression. The severity of maternal symptoms should help dictate medicine use during pregnancy. References Bennett, et al. (2004) Prevalence of depression during pregnancy: systematic review. Obstet Gynecol
103(6):698-709. Bolton HL, et al. (1998) Incidence and demographic correlates of depressive symptoms during pregnancy in an inner London population. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol 19(4):202-9. Bonari L, et al. (2004) Perinatal risks of untreated depression during pregnancy. Can J Psychiatry 49(11)726-735. Chun-Fai-Chan, et al. (2005) Pregnancy outcome of women exposed to bupropion during pregnancy: A prospective comparative study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 192(3):932-936. da-Silva et al. (1999) Postnatal development of rats exposed to fluoxetine or venlafaxine during the third week of pregnancy. Braz J Med Biol Res 32(1):93-8. de Moor RA, et al. (2003) [Withdrawal symptoms in a neonate following exposure to venlafaxine during pregnancy] Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 12;147(28):1370-2. Ericson A, et al. (1999) Delivery outcome after the use of antidepressants in early pregnancy. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 55:503-508 Einaron TR and Einarson A (In press) Newer antidepressants in pregnancy and rates of major malformations: a meta-analysis of prospective comparative studies Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety. Einarson A, et al. (2001) Pregnancy outcome following gestation exposure to venlafaxine: a multicenter prospective controlled study. Am J Psychiarty 158:1728-1730. Forest Laboratories (2005) Product information. GlaxoSmithKline Bupropion Pregnancy Registry (2004) Research Triangle Park, NC. Heikkinen T, et al. (2002) Citalopram in pregnancy and lactation. Clin Pharmacol Ther 72(2):184-91. Kessler R, et al. (1993) Sex and depression in the National Comorbidity Survey I: Lifetime prevalence, chronicity and recurrence. Journal of Affective Disorders 29:85-96. Laine K, et al. (2003) Effects of exposure to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors during pregnancy on serotonergic symptoms in newborns and cord blood monoamine and prolactin concentrations. Arch Gen Psychiarty 60:720-726. Nordeng, et al. (2001) Neonatal withdrawal syndrome after in utero exposure to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. Acta Paediatr 90:288-291. Prescrire International (2004) Neonatal complications after intrauterine exposure to SSRI antidepressants. 13(71)103-104. Sanz EJ, et al. (2005) Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in pregnant women and neonatal withdrawal syndrome: a database analysis. Lancet 365:482-487. Tucker WE (1983) Preclinical toxicology of bupropion: An overview. J Clin Psychiatry 44:60-62. Zuckerman, et al. (1989) Depressive symptoms during pregnancy: relationship to poor health behaviors. Am J Obstet Gynecol 160:1107-1111. Contributors Michelle Martin, BS Genetic Counseling Intern Jennifer Sloan, PhD Genetic Counseling Intern
Mara Gaudette, MS, CGCCoordinator, Illinois Teratogen Information ServiceEugene Pergament, MD, PhD, FACMGNorthwestern Reproductive Genetics, Inc.
Dr. med. habil. Rüdiger Schellenberg Talstraße 29 35625 Hüttenberg Stand: Januar/ 2012 Literaturverzeichnis Publikationen und Buchbeiträge 1. Blume, M. und Schellenberg, R.: Screening-Test für geeignete Adsorptionsmittel zur Extraktion von biologisch wirksamen Vasopression aus Plasma. Diplomarbeit, Medizinis
ProAmatine ® WARNING: Because ProAmatine ® can cause marked elevation of supine blood pressure, it should be used in patients whose lives are considerably impaired despite standard clinical care. The indication for use of ProAmatine ® in the treatment of symptomatic orthostatic hypotension is based primarily on a change in a surrogate marker of effectiveness, an increase in systolic blood